International Council
of Jewish Women
« Home 
About ICJW Español Affiliates Projects Calendar Contact Us
Back
ICJW Projects
 ICJW Affilliates

 

ICJW's Interfaith

 

Australasia Update
Di Hirsh reports that she attended an Asia Pacific Women's Conference in Manila - click here to read more.
She spoke at a pre-event for the Asia Pacific Breakthrough 2-day conference, which will be held in Melbourne in December, just before the Parliament of the World's Religions. At both conferences she explained the interfaith work of the ICJW and NCJWA. The Parliament of the World's Religions will take place in Australia from 3-9 December.

 

The JCMA in Melbourne has held interfaith discussions in thesuccah at Temple Beth Israel, with speakers explaining Jewish, Muslim and Christian festivals. The group will hold a joint panel discussion in November with the Jewish Museum of Australia as part of their exhibition, 'Women in the Bible'.

Intercultural dialogue for the greater Europe: The European Union and the Balkans

Academics, religious leaders, policy-makers and NGO representatives came together at a conference in Zagreb on 23-24 June 2008 to discuss the role of intercultural dialogue for the Balkan region and for Europe as a whole. The theme of this conference, organised by the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Education and Culture, was chosen in light of the 2008 European Year of Intercultural Dialogue. It also follows the tradition to discuss this subject at Jean Monnet Conferences, annual high-level events on current policy priorities in the field of European integration. The relevance of intercultural dialogue both for peace and stability in the Balkans and for the European perspective of the Balkan countries was an important reason to hold the conference in this region.

 

Strasbourg: Tripartite high level meeting

At a high-level meeting in Strasbourg, representatives of the Council of Europe, the OSCE and the United Nations agreed that the promotion of intercultural dialogue and the management of cultural diversity remained among the priorities of their organisations.

The participating organisations discussed different aspects of intercultural dialogue and their collaboration in this area, particularly the role of human rights, the promotion of intercultural competences through education as well as the link between intercultural dialogue and conflict prevention. Participants declared their determination to strengthen co-ordination and co-operation between them in the area of intercultural dialogue, and discussed additional opportunities for joint action in the field of human rights protection, education and conflict prevention.

Intercultural Dialogue at the Council of Europe
                                         
For many months now,  the Council of Europe and its different bodies, have been working towards a White Paper on Intercultural Dialogue, due to be published in October 2007. Governments, parliamentarians, and all actors and sectors of civil society involved in the field have been and are being consulted. To this purpose the COE has been organizing a series of conferences and seminars for a wide-range of organizations (youth, women, migrant, academics) in view of collecting the most and the best information, opinions and examples of good governance concerning intercultural dialogue.

A questionnaire on Intercultural Dialogue was sent to all the  INGO with participative status to the COE just before the ICJW administrative meeting in Washington DC, with the deadline of April 1, the night before this year’s first Pesach Seder. This turned out to be a worst case scenario: going back and forth from making our gefillte fish and matzo balls to ICJW’s visions on intercultural dialogue and experience in the field. We are proud to say that we met the deadline, thanks to real team-work!

I take this opportunity to thank all those who helped answer the questionnaire in the name of ICJW: Judi Widetsky, Nadine Iarchy, Thea Zucker and especially Janine Elkouby. If others were not asked for their contribution, it was simply due to lack of time and extreme stress.

Some of the questions asked:
1) What is your organization’s overall policy vision on the future of the multicultural society and the democratic management of cultural diversity?

2) In your organization’s view, how important is the global context of cultural diversity for the situation in Europe?

8) In the view of your organization, what are the biggest obstacles to intercultural dialogue?

9) Does your organization propose specific, innovative measures for the promotion of intercultural dialogue?

Our answers (translated from the French original by Thea Zucker):

1) and 2) Our INGO considers that it is essential to safeguard 2 fundamental principles: a)respect for cultural and religious diversity  b)respect for secularity, which is the only guarantee of the freedom for all.  Respect for cultural diversity: indeed, for many centuries, Jewish communities have been present and integrated in Europe. Rejection, exclusion, racial hatred (anti-Semitism) and genocide, which bear witness of age-old contempt for cultural and religious diversity, are also part of our common history, the history of Europe. But respect for this diversity must be secured by a rigorous democratic frame, to avoid all the drifts which we have witnessed during the 20th century, and also to avoid drifts from within the communities, which are a threat to individual freedom.


8) We believe that indifference and ignorance, leading very often to the non-recognition of others are obstacles to dialogue. Also prejudice and fear of the other may lock us up in one own’s identity. Age-old hatreds, transmitted through education and culture definitely lead to xenophobia, racism and anti-Semitism.

9) We are no magicians…..nevertheless we believe that education is the main key to open-mindedness towards others. However we should keep in mind that before being ready to meet others, one has to be capable of meeting oneself (Levinas).

 

The April 16 INGO session on intercultural dialogue at the COE was very disappointing, for very general, too general, and “too catholic” and “too French” according to a younger participant of the liaison committee. It is interesting to note that 53 INGOs (out of 395) had sent in their answers to the COE questionnaire, and the final deadline was extended until May 31. On May 25, we received an email from DG IV and Mrs Gabriella Battaini-Dragoni, coordinator of intercultural dialogue for the Council of Europe, thanking us not only for our contribution, but also for our interest in the White Paper.

 

The COE is continuing its consultation work and will soon start analyzing the data collected, with special interest and focus on good practices. For further and on-going developments:  www.coe.int/dialogue


Mary Liling, May 2007

Mary is ICJW representative to the Council of Europe and, together with Karmela Belinki of Finland and Janine Elkouby of Strasbourg, represents ICJW on I&I issues.

 

Teaching Children about Ethics

Evelyn Falck reports from Equador that she is a member of an interfaith organization based in Quito called the Interfaith Council for the Education on Ethics for Children.

This organization is trying to bring together people of different faiths to volunteer to work with trafficked children in the northern frontier between Ecuador and Colombia.  This area is very dangerous and abandoned by both governments.  Ecuador has had special interest in these children since most of them come from broken homes and terrorist-attacked villages in Colombia. The vounteer program is to teach these children about ethics and spirituality.

Unfortunately the Jewish community in is very small, and it has been difficult to get any volunteers to participate. Evelyn is therefore trying to educate members of the Council about the Jewish faith and gave a talk on the subject, with special emphasis on the Jewish woman and her role within Judaism.

She says: “It is very sad to realize that not many people know or understand Judaism, especially in the Latin American countries, where Jews have opted to keep a low profile.  I believe that this is not the correct way.  People should know about Judaism, about the Jewish people, and what the Jews do in their countries.”

 

This article was recommended by Judi Widetzky:

 

 

 

 
Where are the women in Middle East politics?
Rafi'ah Al Tal'ei
 

Washington, DC - Although women struggle to participate in politics around the world, the number is particularly low in the Middle East. Women have had some access to political office for decades, but progress, cheered on from the sidelines by many Western organisations, has been slow. What is holding women back from greater representation in the political sphere and what can be done to encourage their participation?

The results of the recent elections in Morocco brought the debate on female political representation back into the political arena. Only 34 women won seats in the legislature's lower chamber, compared to 35 in the previous elections, a mere 5% of all representatives.

In Turkey, women won 50 out of 550 seats in the Turkish parliament. Although this is still only 9% of the total, it is an encouraging sign since the number of elected women more than doubled from the last parliamentary elections. This percentage of female representation is the second largest in the region after Iraq, where there are 70 women in the 275-member Iraqi parliament.

Women in the Middle East often suffer from very sensitive and complicated political, social and cultural conditions that restrict their ability to easily engage in the political arena. Many women shun political participation to avoid controversy. Conservative religious interpretations sometimes restrict female participation in public life, or prevent them from mixing with men or assuming public posts. There is also the family dimension to consider, with women still traditionally responsible for household duties.

Women are also often seen as less experienced in public affairs, and as a result, voters – both male and female - are less likely to vote for them. Consequently, women either refrain from running for political office or drop out early from a lack of local support.

This usually helps explain why only a small number of female candidates run for public office. For example, of the 800 candidates in the 27 October Oman elections, only 25 were women.

In addition, there are other factors that serve as obstacles for women to run for political office. These include varying and often unsatisfactory levels of democracy, freedom of expression, pluralism, respect for diversity and open dialogue.

Although these factors affect both women and men alike, when coupled with social and cultural structures that favour men over women in the political arena, women are more severely affected. This tends to influence the development and growth of political awareness among citizens.

Advancing the effective participation and genuine representation of women in politics means raising the awareness of the role of women in public life, training women to assume public posts, and encouraging them to enter the political arena in order to enrich their experience, gain voter confidence and prepare future generations of women to participate in even greater numbers.

One means of improving women's participation is through a quota system, which allocates a percentage of seats for women. In countries where such measures have been adopted, such as Tunisia, Iraq and Jordan, we see more women in politics. Most recently, women fought for and won a 15% quota in the upcoming Yemeni elections.

In addition to adopting quotas, leaders of political parties and heads of civil organisations should be persuaded to nominate women to their election lists and assign them positions of greater authority. Promoting a culture of fundraising to support candidates is also an effective way to overcome the difficult economic situation that may hinder women's participation since in many traditional societies men handle much of the family's finances.

In most Middle Eastern countries, there exist several organisations concerned with women issues and human rights. Networking among civil society institutions concerned with the participation of women, whether in a single country or at the regional and international levels, would help to enrich and support women politically.

Many Middle Eastern countries have a Ministry of Women's Affairs. Though this appears to be a step in the right direction, these institutions often work independently of other ministries rather than taking advantage of the role each ministry could play in promoting a cohesive national strategy to increase female representation.

At the international level, a number of organisations have dealt with local organisations in the Middle East to train women for politics, as well as help them overcome some of the problems they face. In past yeas, American non-governmental organisations such as the National Democratic Institute (NDI) and the International Republican Institute (IRI) have hosted joint activities, such as women's political training in the Levant, the Gulf and North Africa during recent election campaigns. NDI and IRI have also continued to organise conferences and workshops to help women gain experience in this field.

Joint coordination and networking among these organisations and individuals will help resolve obstacles to women's political participant at the grass-root level. Helping women realise the importance of their engagement in politics can lead to greater female participation on all levels.

The road to complete political gender equality is long but the struggle continues. These small advances are signs that there are many people working behind the scenes to shift the balance in the future.

Rafi'ah Al Tal'ei is an Omani writer and program director of the Gulf Forum for Citizenship.
Reprinted with permission from: Common Ground News Service (CGNews), 20 November 2007, www.commongroundnews.org

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




ICJW © 2010 Privacy Policy  Terms Of Use
     Powered by Tikshoret